Tuesday, August 31, 2010

2010.5.22 - Setting Tammy/Trinet straight on Section 111 *AGAIN*

from  clay shentrup
to  employees@trinet.com
date  Sat, May 22, 2010 at 23:10
subject Re: case# ______ -- Fwd: question
mailed-by gmail.com
 
Tammy,

Previously, TriNet specifically claimed that the basis for collecting the SSN was a particular amendment to the legal code, from 2007. As that law does not apply to me, I need to know what the legal basis is for you to be disclosing confidential information (my SSN) to them without my consent. There were no attachments to your email, but if you have attachments which describe any other laws which do apply to me, I'd be happy to read them.

If Trinet is unwilling to comply with my repeated requests, I will have no other option but to pursue legal action. Trinet's inability to provide me with any legal justification for their refusal to comply with my repeated requests (well documented, spanning more than five months thus far) would not seem to bode well in such a scenario. My insurance providers have stated that Trinet may push a record update containing an empty or "dummy" SSN, and that solution would seem to be far cheaper and easier for Trinet (and me).

Regards,
Clay Shentrup

No comments:

Post a Comment